| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bruce Boyako
Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 4747
Location: Aussie Aussie Aussie.
|
 Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:48 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Mistress Suffering wrote: | | So why are all the DORM guys on his Nyx loss? |
If you look at the insurg nid that went down, its the same; same DORM guy topped that mail too. From what I gleaned in irc, smartbombs coupled with fighters auto-aggressing, mixed in with lag, left some trisurg capitals with insane damage totals on friendlies. One tri (i think?) dude was saying his mothership's fighters were on another friendly mothership for 10 minutes before he could reign them in.
sucks a bit, but.
e:fb
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheAdj
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Location: Sniggerdly - Pandemic Legion
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| We had the same thing happen to a carrier last week, he was smartbombing, hit a nyx, and the nyx's fighters went after the carrier and did a shitload of damage, it's a mixture of lag and smartbomb damage over a long period of time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Elliott Manchild
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 48
Location: gay4life duh
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I heard it was auto aggro.
Not a great thing to wake up to when you already feel like crap ;p
Anyway lag aside GJ to RZR and co etc.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
XxAngelxX
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 403
Location: OSHIT
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'd think that running 3 smartbombs for a prolonged period of time (his fit) that GD's fighters would have died sooner than they did to do 80k damage.
His fit was ok, A-type hardeners and some of the cheaper officer mods, if you want fat loot you wanna kill the other D00M. Mommys 
BTW, thanks for the birthday present RzR  Although it makes me fairly sad to see the amount of Cap losses TRI are taking after a year with only 6 losses I think it was? They used to be so careful with caps. Isk wise, you're probably nearly equal as far as actual ships go now right?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheAdj
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Location: Sniggerdly - Pandemic Legion
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| XxAngelxX wrote: | You'd think that running 3 smartbombs for a prolonged period of time (his fit) that GD's fighters would have died sooner than they did to do 80k damage.
His fit was ok, A-type hardeners and some of the cheaper officer mods, if you want fat loot you wanna kill the other D00M. Mommys
BTW, thanks for the birthday present RzR Although it makes me fairly sad to see the amount of Cap losses TRI are taking after a year with only 6 losses I think it was? They used to be so careful with caps. Isk wise, you're probably nearly equal as far as actual ships go now right? |
Send all the thank you ISK to me please.
Reinforcing all the towers in 4dt/d4r/eqi right now, saved some towers coming out in EQI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lowa [NSN]
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 1955
Location: NSN
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheAdj wrote: | | Reinforcing all the towers in 4dt/d4r/eqi right now, saved some towers coming out in EQI. |
Well, in all honesty, you havent touched d4r or 4dt yet.
Night isnt over though so I have no doubt I will read more on this for breakfast. Make it a good read pls. 
Cheers,
Lowa
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pesadelo
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 660
Location: Claw/BoB
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| XxAngelxX wrote: | You'd think that running 3 smartbombs for a prolonged period of time (his fit) that GD's fighters would have died sooner than they did to do 80k damage.
His fit was ok, A-type hardeners and some of the cheaper officer mods, if you want fat loot you wanna kill the other D00M. Mommys
BTW, thanks for the birthday present RzR Although it makes me fairly sad to see the amount of Cap losses TRI are taking after a year with only 6 losses I think it was? They used to be so careful with caps. Isk wise, you're probably nearly equal as far as actual ships go now right? |
Donīt seem so titan loose and all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oi - Ogron
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 1301
Location: Short Bus
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have removed my "nobody wants to read your pole up my ass superiority complex driven smack"
_________________
Last edited by Oi - Ogron on Mon May 05, 2008 12:21 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ElweSingollo
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 447
Location: Starlancers - CEO
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pointless reply to even more pointless post removed MOAR battle reports less lollerskates/smack please
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jogvan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 44
Location: NBBL
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oi - Ogron wrote: | | Tri's killboard is another story entirely. The only alliance they have in positive efficiency is Razor, which can be attributed to the Titan kill at the beginning of the campaign. Even that is only at 57% and slowly dropping with each fight we win and each capital loss they take. |
Killboard efficiency is retarded tbh, especially to only look at them for one alliance at the time. With the MM/RZR/IRON & co (is there a fancy name for those yet?) having mixed fleets with several different alliances, makes them all have uber stats on the killboard.
Tri has fielded their capitals lots of times, I wasnt with them when they took the first stations in Deklein, but in the campaigns against FS/Mpire Youwhat, CVA and SmashKilll the caps were used a lot, with almost no losses. This war is a lot different, and it is inevitable that Tri loses some caps in fleet fights, but seeing them getting ganked in silly ways is a bit sad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Profhet
Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 700
Location: In The One True Shard
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElweSingollo wrote: | | pointless reply to even more pointless post removed MOAR battle reports less lollerskates/smack please |
that was my thought. Just post how/how many/why, nobody wants to read your pole up my ass superiority complex driven smack.
looks like CCP needs to fix auto aggro to account for their inability to prevent gamebreaking lag.
_________________
Hold on, I'm gonna let you read my signature, but first, Beyonce's video was better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brunswick2
Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 1259
Location: Tri... no, Cruel... no wait.. the consor... no, umm, RQM, no grr, Triumvirate (again)?
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
omg, their k:d ratio!
there's way too many shit posts to be able to discern, so could someone make an informative post on the situation in branch (in terms of station systems and stuffs)
_________________
 
| James Grand wrote: |
Shitty MMOs are not Pokemon Bruns. You do not need to play them all. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oi - Ogron
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 1301
Location: Short Bus
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Current situation.
NC holds LXWN and BKG station systems.
Trisurgency currently hold 4DT and EQI station systems.
NC is currently removing and incapping Cyno Jammer and Jump bridges in Z-K (first system after BKG). NC POS's in EQI that were re-inforced have come out and been repped i believe. Insurgency POS's to come out of reinforced in Z-K over the next few hours.
Currently NC holds the pipe up to and through the two hostile station systems. Only very small engagements at the moment, with small gangs ganking loners and stragglers on gates. No serious hostile force has been seen in Z-K after the cap loss battle this afternoon.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aypse
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 2333
Location: Bitter retired vet
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Brunswick2 wrote: | | post on the situation in branch (in terms of station systems and stuffs) |
Both sides are achieving their short-term objectives tbh. TRISurge seems to be largely content with retaking & refortifying lost systems (4dt, d4r, and eqi). The Northern Coalition have seemed to accept the fact that they will not be able to retake them now that they have been lost.
The NC have appeared to focus their efforts in the last week or so in keeping bkg well fortified & almost perma-camped. When they have numbers, they strike out against moon mining & logistic POSes in non-station systems. TRISurge FCs seem unconcerned about the losses of these non-essential & mostly placeholder POSes. Again, it appears TRISurge command is focus on securing station systems & letting pilots take a breather before the next major push.
I know that some of the posters above seem to have some tinfoil explanations on the recent increased losses of capitals. From my perspective, its very simple. I have been in TRI since Deklein was secured & we have never deployed capitals with the frequency & numbers that we are in this campaign. When you put more capitals on the field, more die, its not very complex tbh. The reason we are placing some many capitals on the field is because during the majority of timezones, we are outnumbered, and we are outnumbered quite heavily. Carriers & moms are in heavy use repping POSes, moving supplies, & bolstering our lower numbers of support with fighters & remote reps.
It's easy to say, 'TRI never lost capitals like this before' or whatever. The fact is, TRI carriers have never (since I have been here) been asked to provide such a 24/7 on-the-front-line role as we are asking them to do currently. I am sure some capital pilots are uncomfortable with this. From what I have seen though, most capital pilots love it, myself included. I don't know about anyone, but I didn't buy an archon & revelation so that it could get dusty in a hanger. I want my capitals with dents, scapes, & scars.....because that shit is fun as hell. So go ahead, cruticize us for some of the capitals we have lost....but we are having fun.
A big 'thank you' to the NC for providing tons of fun. Let's hope this war rages on for forever!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hangnoose
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 159
Location: Atlas
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Aypse wrote: | | Brunswick2 wrote: | | post on the situation in branch (in terms of station systems and stuffs) |
Both sides are achieving their short-term objectives tbh. TRISurge seems to be largely content with retaking & refortifying lost systems (4dt, d4r, and eqi). The Northern Coalition have seemed to accept the fact that they will not be able to retake them now that they have been lost.
|
Thats why we RF about 6 insurge towers in eqi tonight? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Memberlist
